On Triton and Other Matters: An Interview with Samuel R. Delany The following text did not originate as any kind of formal interview. Instead it grew out of an. After the last post on Ursula Le Guin’s The Dispossessed, it made sense to me to read through Samuel Delany’s Trouble on Triton in my best of. The Dispossessed has the subtitle “An Ambiguous Utopia” and Triton answers with the subtitle “An Ambiguous Heterotopia.” In Delany’s long.
|Published (Last):||24 July 2005|
|PDF File Size:||5.78 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.63 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
There are many strings of words that can appear both in an SF text and in an ordinary text of naturalistic fiction.
Nor is that texture necessarily conceived of as “the good life. Unflinching critique of heteropatriarchy FTW.
Triton (novel) – Wikipedia
In light of this, the quote you’ve presented, which is one of Bron’s musings, seems strangely out of place. That becomes a contradiction in terms.
Once I learned this, my fear of a technological accident vanished though I still don’t think the threat of nuclear war is any less serious a political problem. The point, of course, is that some descriptions really do have explanatory force. You’re not going to get teiton dystopian implications in the discussion from a high placed political functionary arguing for the superiority of his welfare system.
Babbling Books: Triton by Samuel R. Delany
Do you have any questions about SF in general? In Triton it “solves” problems I’m perfectly aware general reasoning can’t solve. Another novel, another novel I can think of so many things to comment on and I hate to oversimplify my observation with a glib comment but I think it is a book that deserves more of my attention.
What larger structures, you begin asking as you move outward, might produce such a life texture? As the subtitle implies, the novel offers several conflicting perspectives on the concept of utopia.
Not only was he sulky and moody, he was one of the most boring characters I’ve had the displeasure of following. Some of the philosophy, science and other aspects of the story are impossible to decipher. View all 4 comments. No, you’re not going to learn which office is on what floor of City Hall and what its official relation is with the offices either side of it—the way you would in a utopia. There’s a very direct dialogue going on between these books.
Trouble on Triton: An Ambiguous Heterotopia
The results of his transformation are, predictably, not good. It might be, arguably, panarchist. The later chapters include a horrible friton of the interplanetary war. I wanted to like this book, but rather than develop characters, a plot, or setting, Delany appears to throw a bunch of interesting ideas into a blender and set to frappe. In the end, admittedly, he loses all of them, but they give him an tritn lot of leeway, explaining to him precisely what’s happening, offering him options.
It looks like a ‘difficult’ novel, but that’s really an illusion. But what if you are a young, gay African-American man of leftist tendencies writing in a time when almost no black writers—or gay writers—had stormed the castle of science fiction? This could entirely be my faulty reading of the story, and I do agree that Delany’s characterizations in this book were lacking across the board.
This proves, ultimately, to be detrimental to his relationship with the Spike, a fact that becomes apparent when they run into each other while Bron is part of a political delegation to the antagonistic Earth.
And I find it trigon insulting to readers that Delany would purposely include irrational elements in his novel.
We have a similar system in place for our health insurance. A writer sits at his desk and gnaws at an idea. Bron is initially likable, has the qualities we would deem intrinsic to a more heroic protagonist–good-looking, seemingly principled, even spontaneous also male, white. And I don’t think such a historical nudge hurts a story in any way. I don’t think thus might be the best novel for someone like me who hasn’t read Delany yet. Because I, too, am a man of today, and perhaps I share some of the insecurities and prejudices of this asshole.
I’m only giving one very, very subjective view of the book. But it’s in Junk City that bricoleurs flourish at their happiest and most efficient—though it’s often the engineers who provide the junk the gomi no sensei works with.
This is science fiction, and as I find with a lot of traditional science fiction what I think real readers call “hard sci-fi” is that so much of it is boring to me. Probably I was trying to say too much at once. But, no, I’m not sure how, in the long run, it would work. The problem with this extension of the argument is the problem with all thematics: That was the start of the book. When you call Triton a heterotopia, do you mean it has all four—or all eight—of those images?
There is tension with regards to immigration to the outer moons from the inner worlds of the Solar System, and that may or may not frame the action — the reader isn’t really given enough on the topic to decide. Trivia About Trouble on Triton Give it a shot if you’re looking for an entry point to Delany’s full length works. Granted your caveatwhat’s your subjective opinion of Triton’s whole emphasis on “subjective inviolability”?
Let me illustrate this by some examples I’ve used many times before. When you make a stylistic choice like that, this is the chance you take: In one of his non-fiction books, Times Square Red, Times Square Bluehe draws on personal experience to examine the relationship between the effort to redevelop Times Square and the public sex lives of working-class men, gay and straight, in New York City.