An Independent Book Review In the Combat Zone. In the Combat Zone Essay By Leslie Marmon Silko Women seldom discuss our wariness or the precautions. This is what the author Leslie Marmon Silko believes, which is illustrated in her essay, “In the Combat Zone.” Silko writes this essay to acknowledge to women. Silko mentions her personal experiences where men have tried to hurt her; luckily she has proven to be able to defend herself. How has she.
|Country:||United Arab Emirates|
|Published (Last):||5 November 2007|
|PDF File Size:||10.12 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.72 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
On top of Silko’s strengths in her essay, she also has a few weaknesses. The diplomatic strategies will help women negotiate or trick their way out of a violent attack rather than using violent action.
In the combat zone
Please re-enter recipient e-mail address es. Another weakness in Silko’s essay is her personal experience story when she backs down from giving the drunken hunters a full punishment. Please select Ok if you would like to proceed with this request anyway. She is arguing for women to be stronger and sticking up for themselves, yet she backs down from making the hunters fully learn their lesson of how to treat women. Silko is a strong believer for women carrying firearms. She was the responsible, clear-headed sibling, while even in junior high I had shown a penchant for taking risks.
Ib, guns are very dangerous they are a way for people to protect themselves against others harming them. Posted by Ryan Godin at 8: Please enter your name. Built on the Johns Hopkins University Campus.
She states that this unequal treatment results in women having less opportunity and hinders their ability to succeed, which is the exact same statement that Virginia Woolf makes in her writing. You may have already requested this item. Droberg, Daniel, and Robin Huiras. Another arguable issue raised by Silko’s essay is empowering women. Although Silko presents a good argument, I do not fully agree with it. This historical information fits in well with her argument for guns and empowerment of women.
Instead, they should engage in a self-defense class in which the majority of the class provides diplomatic strategy.
The choices seemed stark—stay at home until I was safely coupled with a husband, or get out there and see and do all I wanted to see and znoe, denying the reality that I was far more at risk for getting hurt than my—stronger, fleeter, less sexually vulnerable—brother. WorldCat is the world’s largest library catalog, helping you find library materials online.
I choose to compare “In the Combat Zone” Leslie Silko and “J by Emely Madrid on Prezi
The name field is required. Presently, for millions of women of all socioeconomic backgrounds, sundown is lockdown. In this essay, Leslie Marmon Silko challenges this belief and calls for change in the way women think of their own vulnerability. Please enter recipient e-mail address es. Remember me on this computer.
Argument Critique — Gun Control
In my opinion, safety is what all living organisms stride for and it is not right that woman have to constantly deal with paranoia and worries when they are alone.
Write a review Rate this item: As an undergraduate at Barnard, she had been mugged in the Manhattan subway, but our parents seemed to worry far more about me than they did about her. Please verify that you are not a robot. Ryan- I thought this was a well thought out analysis. Having earned her MBA from Wharton, my sister worked her way up the ladder at one of the largest insurance companies in the world.
The two drunken hunters came after her with fiberglass xone when she was out riding her horse. Silko’s argument is made more credible due leslis her experience with violence from strangers. By doing this, Silko is contradicting one of her main points of empowering women. Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.
These numbers prove there is something wrong with the way Americans control guns.
This incident does not justify the need for gun for two reasons. I think it shows a good example of the argumentative structure.